Perry March Convicted of Wifes Murder

On August 17, 2006, Perry March, a successful corporate lawyer, was sentenced in the murder of his wife, Janet March, ending a 10-year mystery.  A decade earlier, Janet had mysteriously disappeared from her four-acre Forest Hills estate in Nashville, Tennessee, leaving behind two children and a thriving career as a painter and childrens book illustrator. Rumors were rampant, but there was no evidence that a crime had been committed. Missing On the evening of August 15, 1996, the couple got into an argument and, according to Perry, Janet decided to take a 12-day vacation. She packed three bags, around $5,000 in cash, a bag of marijuana, and her passport and drove off in her gray 1996 Volvo at 8:30 p.m., he said, without telling anyone where she was going. Around midnight, Perry contacted his in-laws, Lawrence and Carolyn Levine, and told them that Janet had left on vacation. At first, the Levines didnt worry, but as time went on, their concerns grew. They wanted to contact police but later said Perry had discouraged them from doing so. Perry said it was the other way around. Perry and the Levines searched for Janet for several days, but when their efforts failed, they contacted police. That marked two weeks since Janet had disappeared. Perry and Janet had two children together—a son, Samson, and a daughter, Tzipora. Perry said that Janet had planned to return by August 27 to celebrate Samsons birthday. This struck investigators as odd because Samsons birthday party was scheduled for two days before Janets return. Investigators also learned that on the day Janet disappeared, she had asked her mother to go with her to see a divorce attorney the next day. Janet had discovered that Perry had paid  $25,000 to avoid a sexual harassment suit after he was caught writing sexually explicit letters to a paralegal that worked in his office.  (Perry had been fired as a result and was hired at his father-in-laws firm.) The authorities believed that Janet had confronted Perry about wanting a divorce, and an argument erupted.   The Rolled-Up Rug There were questions about a rug that was seen at the March home the day after Janet disappeared. Marissa Moody and Janet had planned to meet on August 16 so their sons could play together. When Moody arrived at the March residence, Janet wasnt at home. Perry was, but he didnt come out of his office to greet Moody, sending word through Samson that she could still drop off her son to play. While at the March home, Moody saw a large, dark, rolled-up rug lying on the floor. She knew that Janet kept the homes beautiful hardwood floors polished—and rug-free. When Moody returned to pick up her son, she told authorities,  the rug was gone. Another witness reported seeing a rug that day at the March home. However, Ella Goldshmid, the March childrens nanny, did not recall it. When investigators questioned Perry about the rug, he denied that it existed and said Moody never entered the home the day that she claimed to have seen it. Perrys denial about the rug suggested to detectives that during the couples argument the night before, Perry, who held a black belt in karate, could have easily killed Janet, who weighed just 104 pounds, hidden her body inside the rug, then disposed of it the following day. More Evidence On September 7, Janets car was located at a Nashville apartment complex. The police found Janets passport and other personal effects but no sign of Janet.  Her car was backed into the parking spot. According to Janets best friend, she always pulled into parking places forwards, never backwards. A flight attendant remembered seeing someone resembling Perry leaving that  apartment complex on a mountain bike around 1 a.m. the night Janet disappeared. Perry and Janet shared a personal computer, but not long after she went missing, so did the hard drive. Leaving Nashville A month after Janet disappeared, Perry and the children moved to Chicago. Shortly after the move, Perry and his in-laws, the Levines, got into a legal battle over Janets assets. Perry wanted to be granted control of her assets and the Levines opposed it. They also wanted visitation rights, which Perry vehemently opposed, saying that they only wanted access so the detectives could interview the children. In 1999, the court awarded the Levines visitation, but before they could see the children, Perry moved his family to his fathers house in Ajijic, Mexico. The Levines had Janet declared legally dead and sued Perry for wrongful death in the disappearance of their daughter. Perry failed to show up for court, and the Levines were awarded $133 million. Perry had the verdict overturned on appeal. Grandparents Fight for Custody A year after moving to Mexico, Perry married Carmen Rojas Solorio. The couple had a child together. The Levines continued their fight to visit their grandchildren. With the help of the Mexican government, they were able to bring Samson and Tzipora to Tennessee for a maximum visitation of 39 days. The Levines then began their fight to gain full custody of the children. Perry claimed that the Levines had abducted his children, and two Tennessee attorneys agreed to represent him pro  bono. The Levines lost, and the children were returned to their father. Cold Case Detectives In early 2000, two cold case detectives revisited Janets disappearance. By 2004, the investigators and the prosecutors office had compiled evidence against Perry and presented it to a grand jury, which returned an indictment against him on charges of second-degree murder, tampering with evidence, and abuse of a corpse. Perry was also indicted for felony theft for allegedly taking $23,000 from his father-in-laws firm, where he was working in 1999, presumably to raise the $25,000 to quash claims by the paralegal that he had written her sexually explicit letters. The indictment remained secret until the FBI and the Mexican government could work out Perrys extradition. In August 2005, nearly nine years after Janet disappeared, Perry was deported from Mexico and arrested. During the bond hearing, one of the cold case detectives,  Pat Postiglione, stated that during the flight from Mexico to Nashville, Perry had said he was willing to plead guilty in exchange for a sentence of no more than five to seven years. Perry denied ever making such a statement. Plotting to Kill In-Laws Perry was held in the Davidson  County Jail in Nashville, where he befriended Russell Farris, who was awaiting trial for attempted murder. Perry told Farris that he could arrange to have his bond posted if he would agree to kill the Levines. Farris eventually told his attorney about it, and the information was turned over to the authorities. Farris agreed to work with the police, who recorded subsequent conversations between the two men. Also recorded were conversations Farris had with Perrys father, Arthur March, who was still living in Mexico. Arthur told Farris the best time of day to go to the Levines home, how to obtain a gun, the type of gun to get, and how to travel to Ajijic, Mexico, after he had killed them. Farris told Perry he was being released, although he was being transferred to another jail. Before Farris left, Perry wrote down the Levines address and handed him the piece of paper. Perry was arrested and charged with two counts of solicitation to commit murder by Davidson County prosecutors. He was also charged with two counts of conspiring to commit murder by federal prosecutors. Arthur  March was charged with the same crimes but remained in Mexico as a fugitive. In 2006, Arthur pleaded guilty to the solicitation charge and worked out a plea deal in exchange for testifying against Perry for Janets murder. Trials In April 2006, Perry was found guilty of embezzling $23,000 from his father-in-laws firm. In June 2006, he was convicted of conspiracy to murder the Levines. In August 2006, Perry went on trial for the second-degree murder  of his wife,  tampering with evidence, and abuse of a corpse. Among the evidence was a videotaped deposition given by Arthur in which he talked about how much he disliked the Levines and spoke with disdain about Janet. He then said that Perry had killed Janet by striking her with a wrench. A few weeks after her murder, Perry had driven Arthur to where he had disposed of the body and explained that it had to be moved because it was about to become a construction site. The two then drove Janets body to Bowling Green, Kentucky, where Arthur disposed of it in some thick brush. Her body has never been found, although Arthur tried to lead authorities to the spot where he remembered leaving Janet. Conviction On August 17, 2006, just a week after the trial had started, the jury deliberated for 10 hours before reaching a verdict of guilty on all charges. Perry was sentenced to a total of 56 years for murdering Janet and for the attempted murder-for-hire of the Levines. He is serving in the Northeast Correctional Complex in Mountain City, Tennessee, and wont be eligible for parole until 2035. Arthur March was sentenced to five years for the attempted murder-for-hire of the Levines. He died three months later.

Anger of Gods Depicted in the Old Testament and Kafkas...

The anger of Gods throughout both stories leads you to believe that the Gods will not hesitate to take revenge on mankind for creating a world of evil in a world they created for good. The Gods from Metamorphoses and the God from the Old Testament create a world full of life, to live happy and full of grace. The destruction and recreation of the world by the Gods of each book, however similar they may seem, are full of differences as they both teach mankind lessons that should not be forgotten. â€Å"Whatever God it was, who brought order to the universe, and gave it division, subdivision, he molded earth† Metamorphoses pg 685. In the beginning the earth had nothing, no light to call sun, no water to bath in, and no human to walk on the†¦show more content†¦The Metamorphoses story has a longer stage of evil that makes the Gods realize the world was evil. There are four stages to the transformation from good to evil. The Golden ages had no laws, no justice, and no punishment because there was no need for these things; the world was right and all was good. The second was the Bronze Age men were content to be at home, they did not travel and there was no need for soldiers. This age split of the seasons. Jove shortened the summer, added spring, fall, and winter. The Bronze Age took on aggressiveness and men were quick to pick up weapons. The forth age was the Iron Age; â€Å"righteousness fled the earth, and in their place came trickery and slyness, plotting, swindling, violence and the demand desire of having† Metamorphoses pg 687. During the Iron Age the heavens were no longer safe, the Gods fought each other. This lead Jove to call for an intervention and the Gods did not hesitate. The Old Testament God says, that the world which he created was turning evil and knew he had to destroy man and all the living things on the earth. Noah was the only man who â€Å"found grace in the Lords eyes† Old Testament pg 57. The lord realized that Noah was full of good and decided to spare him his wife and Noah’s three sons and their wives. God also decided to save a male and a female of each animal that walked the earth. God told Noah to build an Ark that would fit all these animals,

Innovative Entrepreneurs free essay sample

This paper will compare Walt Disney, representing the traditional entrepreneur, with Bill Miller. The Disney brand is embedded in the minds of millions around the world. In fact, it would be very difficult to find anyone who hasn’t been or dreamt of going to any of the Disney amusement parks. Walt Disney, nee Walter Elias Disney, is an American film producer, director, screenwriter, voice actor, animator, entrepreneur, entertainer, and philanthropist (Wikipedia, 2011). During his teenage years, he had begun entertaining many with his cartoons and Laugh-O-Grams. Disney, innovator and entrepreneur, eventually opened his own Hollywood studio with his brother Roy, which has grown into a multi-billion dollar empire. Disney, as a more traditional entrepreneur, knew very early in life that he wanted to pursue some form of artistic animation that audiences that could connect to on a deeper level. He wanted to impact the human element with the stories he told using the characters he designed. We will write a custom essay sample on Innovative Entrepreneurs or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Bill Miller too, has made a strong impact in the lives of many. Bill Miller’s video is quite moving. His story as an entrepreneur â€Å"who happens to be a quadriplegic† and his acceptance of his circumstance are compelling and inspirational. Miller has impacted the lives of many wheelchair-bound individuals and their respective families and friends, specifically with his innovative apparatus that provides those who are paralyzed the ability to go bowling. His aim, as stated on his website, was to enhance the quality of life of the disabled by affording them the same opportunities of fun entertainment that fully mobile individuals enjoy. Of course, he did not set out to be paralyzed from the neck down. In fact, I’m sure if he were asked if he could go back to August 23, 1997, he would probably be honest in saying he would have made some different life choices. Nonetheless, the key quality that was conveyed by Miller’s video was the absence of self-deprecation. In fact, his framing of problems as challenges that need to be conquered is a critical aspect of his entrepreneurial mindset that has helped him develop and promote his business ideas. Additionally, his attitude has been instrumental in overcoming the limitations of his condition. Disney and Miller share this entrepreneurial spirit. Though their circumstances and approaches are different, they share high levels of passion, optimism, ambition, adaptability, energy and persistence to follow through with innovative (and not –so innovative) ideas into fruition. Both entrepreneurs discussed herein have pursued ambitious creative works that are not easily achieved, and in Miller’s case, not easily conceivable. The notion that quadriplegics can bowl is astonishing, yet Miller has achieved this incredible feat and is developing other recreational projects to help others meet their everyday challenges. Miller and Disney have shown that an entrepreneur’s success is not dependent on the product manufactured but on the individual who spearheads the product or service to its various stages. For instance, in the 1960’s, it probably would have been difficult for Disney to find funds to build the Experimental Prototype City (or Community) of Tomorrow, known today as the EPCOT theme park in Orlando, Florida, where park visitors learn about cultures from all around the world and here diversity is embraced. Thankfully, he was an optimistic visionary who saw beyond the present and as a result, millions today share the vision and hope of a better tomorrow. Miller scores high in adaptability. Entrepreneurs have to continuously improve and customize their goods and services to meet consumer demands and needs. The best entrepreneurs are able to step ahead, modify or create a product to the consumer’s needs, sometimes before the consumer even realizes they have this need. Miller mentioned that there wasn’t even a market for the IKAN Bowler but one developed after he successfully operated it himself and with the help of his partners, he marketed it effectively. I strongly believe that quadriplegics (and paraplegics) never would have thought it possible for them to ever experience the thrill of accomplishing any recreational activity that adds back some normalcy to their lives; but Miller has clearly shown that he does not believe in the impossible.

Power Does Not Come From A Gun Essays - Pacifism, Nonviolence

Power Does Not Come From a Gun Power. A word from which many meanings derive. To each individual, it means something distinct and it is how one uses their power that makes up who they are. Power does not come from the barrel of a gun. A gun can do nothing without someone there to pull the trigger. The power to take a life rests within the person, the gun simply serving as their tool. When groups protesting for a cause they believe in use violent tactics, do they ever accomplish anything? When we kill , what do we achieve? To say that power lies in the barrel of a gun is to say that the most effective way to get what we want, or what we feel we deserve is to murder. It is only those with no faith in their dreams, or belief in themselves who could make such a statement. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "If a man hasn't found something he will die for, he isn't fit to live." A leader in the Black community and the recipient of the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize, King's accomplishment of attaining civil rights for Blacks was a great one, but the road to achievement was long and full of sacrifices. It was a time when Blacks had no rights and most of them accepted this as the way it was and no one could do anything about it. Most of them, but not King. When the police arrested a black woman for sitting in the front of the bus and refusing to give up her seat to a white woman, King led a committee that organized a boycott of buses. The results were that on April 23, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled that "segregation in public transportation is unconstitutional" and that South Carolina as well as 12 other states must remove the "whites only" signs that hung in the front of the buses. This was just the beginning, he vowed to continue his fight using "passive resistance and the weapon of love". He helped establish the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and became its first president. Then in 1957, King met with Vice-president Nixon in Washington to "discuss racial problems . He went on to lead protests, demonstrations and marches, making the non-violent resistance stronger than it had ever been before. He succeeded in making people aware that every human being is born equal and that no one should be denied his civil rights. Martin Luther King had a dream and he knew that there was only one way to make it come true, to wake up and to take action. He was a true example of someone putting their power to good use. He started his life with a disadvantage, he was hated because of the color of his skin, but he did not let that stop him. He was arrested, thrown in jail, stabbed, stoned, he even had his home bombed. Through it all, he refused to give up, he had found a cause worth dying for and he did. He was murdered on the night of April 4, 1968. People tried to use their power to stop him and his fight. In the end, they may have succeeded in killing its leader, but the battle against racism lived on. Looking back, people say that Martin Luther King Jr. was a very powerful man. I have never heard anyone say his attackers or his murderers had. "I am indeed, a practical dreamer. My dreams are not airy nothings. I want to convert my dreams into realities, as far as possible." Mahatma is the name the people of India gave to Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. The meaning is Great Soul, and they considered him as the father of their nation. He named his autobiography, "The story of My Experiments With Truth." That was, after all, what his life was about: the truth and his search to find it. He was against violence in any form, he felt there existed better methods of accomplishing things, and he proved to be successful. he made up his won technique for social action that he called satyagraha, "non-violent resistance to injustice and wrong." Gandhi's actions were guided by